 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
ที่มา:Kasetsart Journal (Social Sciences)(วารสารวิทยาสารเกษตรศาสตร์ สาขาสังคมศาสตร์)หัวเรื่อง:สุขภาพจิตและประสิทธิภาพในการทำงานของตำรวจจราจรไทย |
 หัวเรื่อง:สุขภาพจิตและประสิทธิภาพในการทำงานของตำรวจจราจรไทย ผู้เขียน: จตุพร เลิศล้ำ,  ดร.ปนัดดา ชำนาญสุข, ผู้ช่วยศาสตราจารย์ , กรรณิกา คำดี, Chilai Sakdivorapong สื่อสิ่งพิมพ์:pdf AbstractThe number of traffic accidents in Bangkok has increased along with workload of traffic police, that
are associated with mental health of traffic police. The identification of factors associated with mental health
allow us to propose primary prevention measure for this important traffic police problem. The objectives
of this research were as follows: 1) To study correlation between personal factors, work-family conflict, social
support, personality, and mental health of traffic police. 2) To predict mental health of traffic police through
co-predictive variables composed of age, length of work, rank, work-family conflict, social support and
personality. 3) To study the correlation between mental health and work performance. The samples were
229 traffic police in Metropolitan Police Division 2. The questionnaires comprise of 5 part: personal factors,
work-family conflict, social support, personality trait was estimated by The Eysenck Personality Inventory
(EPI) and mental health was measured by Thai GHQ-30. The statistics included chi -square, percentage,
Spearman rank correlation coefficient, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, and stepwise multiple
regression analysis.
The results showed that age, experience, rank, social support and personality (extraversion,
neuroticism) were positively correlated and work-family conflict was negatively correlated, with mental health.
Work-family conflict, social support, age and personality variable (extraversion, neuroticism) were statistical
significant predictors of the mental health at 28.4%. Correlation analysis revealed a significant positive relation
of mental health and work performance of Thai traffic police at the .001 significant level. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|